Rung Five

How we rate the evidence: what each rung means

Every rating on Rung Five answers one question: how strong is the human evidence? The answer is a rung from 1 to 5, and rung five is the strongest. It reflects the quality of the studies, not how popular, natural or expensive something is, and the same substance can sit on different rungs for different uses. Rungs measure certainty only, so there are no negative rungs. Whether something helps or harms is shown separately, as a verdict.

RungNameWhat it takesHow to read it
Separate harm flagA low rung means unproven, not dangerous. Known safety problems get their own red flag, whatever the rung.
Untested claimsRarely, we include a popular idea that has never been studied directly. It carries a dashed "untested" tag and sits on rung 1.
DiscardedAnything tested fairly and found not to work is removed from the rankings and listed under "didn't hold up".

Reading ratings on foods, myths and exposures

Treatments and habits elsewhere on the site are all things that might help, so a rung is all they need. Foods and everyday exposures can lower risk, raise it or make no difference, so each one gets two separate labels.

1Verdict

What the studies found: lowers risk, raises risk, no link, and so on. It's written in words, with green for lower risk and red for higher.

2Evidence rung

How sure we can be of that verdict, on the same 1 to 5 scale in the table above. On foods and exposures it's shown in grey, so color only ever means direction.

A high rung means certain, not big.Processed meat and radon both sit on rung 5 because the evidence is overwhelming, not because they're the most dangerous things on the site. Processed meat raises bowel cancer risk by about 16% per 50 g a day: real and well proven, but modest. Open any food or claim to see "How big" where studies give a figure.

Three examples

Every verdict we use